"You
are what you eat" is an age old
adageand it is a fact that it is food that
maketh a man. The food we eat, its quality,
quantity, its timing and combinations is proven
time and again to be of utmost importance in
Health as well as in Disease. At the Bombay
Hospital we have been serving vegetarian food
from the inception of this institution and now we
feel that the time has come to offer scientific
justification for this. Not only on religious or
moral grounds is this justifiable, but also on
scientific grounds vegetarian food seems the more
suitable diet for human beings. More scientific
work has been done on vegetarianism in the last
two decades than in the entire previous history
of the world. Therefore, we felt that we should
take the lead and bring to the fore all that
there is to know on vegetarianism from the
scientific angle and thereby justity the use of
vegetarianism in health and in disease.
There is a
myth amongst people that consumption of meat
would make them strong. It is also commonly
believed that nonvegetarian food has more
nutritive value. It is significant and
embarrassing to note, that while in U.S.A. nearly
10 million people have adopted vegetarianism and
more and more people in U.K., U.S.S.R., West
Germany, Japan, Switzerland, Israel and Mexico
are gradually turning to vegetarian diet not only
on humanitarian grounds but more so on medical
grounds, in India many vegetarians have started
eating meat and eggs only on "wrong"
beliefs of the supposedly good qualities of
nonvegetarian diet.
There are
many books written for lay public on
vegetarianism based on cruelty to animals,
spirituality, cultural and philosophical values,
economic, ecological, anthropological and
humanitarian grounds. This book is being written
by a team of specialists from various faculties
of our institute and from other institutes in
Bombay and abroad. Here they discuss and show
that from the medical point of view the
vegetarian diet is as good or is more suited to
the human system than a nonvegetarian diet.
Unlike other books written on vegetarianism which
show that non-vegetarian food is bad for health,
we have tried to prove, with medical evidence
that vegetarian food is as nutritious or superior
in some cases, to non-vegetarian food.
If only
this publication can remove the bias from the
minds of the public; if only they could be
convinced that they could not only live longer
with vegetarian diet, but also not suffer from
many crippling diseases, we would feel that we
have been amply rewarded.
Since this
book is a joint effort of many scientists it has
been difficult to prevent the overlap of views.
In fact, at times, repetitions have intentionally
been retained to maintain the individual
readability of the chapter. To give this
scientific publication a well rounded look,
chapters on growth, immunity and microbiology
have been included. Immunology for the general
physician is, at best, complicated and so it is
for the lay person. Hence the chapter on Immunity
and Vegetarian Diet may make heavy reading.
Similarly the chapter on microbiology has been
written only to emphasize the fact that the kind
of food we eat decides the kind of bacteria that
are present within us. Facts of their functions
are pouring in every day and their real
importance will be evident to us very soon.
Religion or
spiritualism are not the field of doctors. But
the Indian public should be enlightened about the
good qualities of Vegetarian diet which are the
high fibre content, low cholesterol content and
low incidence of zoonotic disorders. Also, there
is strong evidence that vegetarians are at a
lesser risk for alcoholism.
In this
monograph we have reproduced a few articles from
'The Bombay Hospital Journal' which is the
regular scientific publication of Bombay Hospital
Institute of Medical Sciences.
Vegetarianism
can be divided into vegetarian, lacto-vegetarian
and lacto-ovo-vegetarian diets. In this book
lacto-vegetarian diet has been accepted as the
Indian vegetarian diet. Similarly, many people,
who eat fish, chicken and meat also eat
vegetabies, fruits and cereals. Thus, really
speaking scientifically they should be labelled
as 'Omnivorous'. Instead for them, we have in
this book used the colloquial term
'non-vegetarian'. The debate is wide open but it
seems from the facts presented herein that the
scales are tipped heavily in favour of
vegetarianism.
|