CAPSULE "SUJAT" FOR COMPREHENSIVE ANTENATAL CARE AND PREVENTION OF PREGNANCY INDUCED HYPERTENSION
Laxmi Bhosale, D Padia, Harish Malhotra,Deepti Thakkar, HS Palep, KM Algotar
Dept. of Obst. and Gynaecology, St. Georges Hospital and JJ Hospital, Mumbai.
Comprehensive ANC care should ensure a good fetal wt. at birth. Birth wt. is not only the indicator of the health of the new born, but also predictive of the future health of the child. Low birth wt. babies are prone to suffer from DM hypertension, coronary vascular disorders in their later life.
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy is a universally common disease. How pregnancy induces and aggravates hypertension is still not understood fully. The incidence of pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) in India ranges from 5-15%.
In Primi’s 16%
It causes IUGR leading to low birth weights. It increases the maternal mortality by 10-15% and the perinatal mortality and morbidity by 15 to 25%.
The most important determinants of blood pressure are
2.Peripheral vascular resistance (PVR)
Despite the increase in the cardiac output, there is a relative decrease in the BP due to the decrease in PVR during pregnancy.
This decrease is brought out by
(i)attenuated response to vasopressors
(ii)decrease in the ratio of PGI2/TXA2 and antioxidants/lipid peroxidases.
(iii)changes in the local factors like nitric oxides, endothelins.
There is an accumulated evidence which states that abnormal placentation is one of the initial events leading to this disease. The main feature is inadequate trophoblastic invasion of maternal spiral arterioles. Therefore the arteries retain their musculoelastic walls and thus respond to the vasoconstrictors produced e.g. leukotrienes and lipid peroxidases.
The other factors leading to the vasospasm are, immune complexes, genetic predisposition, dietary deficiency of Ca, Mg vasoactive compounds and endothelial cell injury. A study also indicates that there is a deficiency of antioxidants in patients with pregnancy induced hypertension.
The important vasodilators are PGI2 and NO. A deficiency of these can lead to PIH. The endothelium of the blood vessels is the site of formation of NO + PGI2. Endothelial cell damage leads to imbalance between vasodilators and vasoconstrictors leading to PIH.
Essential fatty acid GLA (Gamma Linolenic acid) is known to produce PGI2 in preference to TXA2.
Mg supplementation is known to help Ca metabolism; Ca deficiency is known to be one of the causative factors of PIH.
Antioxidant supplementation also helps in preventing PIH by preventing placental peroxides leading to endothelial cell damage.
Nutrition and immunity are interlinked. Immunology has pivotal role in final outcome of pregnancy. Rasayana ingredients in Sujat help in modulating various immune processes at placental level. Therefore Sujat formulation which provides, all the above mentioned factors is expected to prevent PIH and ensure a good foetal outcome.
Asparagus Racemosus Essential aminoacids Fatty acids Ipomoea Digitata Starch and Mucilage Trapa Bispinosa
Embellica Officianale Vit. C in buffered state
(an excellent oxidant)
Trapa Bispinosa Magnesium Glycerhiza Glabra
Potassium nitrate, Ca++, Flavanoids
very good NO donors
Withania Somnifera Iron Hemidesmus Indicum Essential oil with antimicrobial action in GIT Tribulis Terrestris Increases GFR without electrolyte imbalance, contains 6 Essentialamino acids; also K+ nitrate Sida Cordifolia Special anticonvulsant action and antipyretic action. Glycerrhiza Glabra Produces interferons Raises immunity, antiviral activity, Platelet activation factor inhibited. Inhibits myelosuppression actionof endotoxins e.g. liposaccharideendotoxin of E. Coli. It is a best free radical scavenger. Asparagus Racemosus Potent anti oxytocic Anti ADH activity. Prolactin Secretion increased.
To prove the efficiency or otherwise of the drug, a controlled trial consisting of 905 pts was done at Dept. of Obst. and Gyn., St. George’s Hosp., Grant Medical College, Mumbai.
The study was carried over a period of 12 months from Dec. 97 to Nov. 98. There were 328 cases studied where cap. Sujat was given twice a day as soon as they got registered for antenatal care.
577 cases were in the control group who did not receive Sujat, but received routine antenatal care.
All these patients were followed up in the OPD and the indoor till they delivered and went home. Patient’s BP, urine, proteinuria and wt. were checked. Mode of delivery and labour outcome was studied in all the cases and the results were analysed in 2 groups, in terms of incidence of PIH; mode of delivery; foetal wt. perinatal morbidity and mortality.
Statistical analysis of the study was made to find out the significant difference between the groups treated with Sujat and the control group. In this study Chi square (X2) test was used.
O = Observed value, E = Expected value
The Table 1 shows that 84.4% of total cases in Sujat treatment group was in the age group of 21-31 years as compared to 79.9% in the control group which is almost same and difference between these two percentage was not significant.
TABLE 1 Age distribution in both groups which are identical
Age group in years
Sujat Control No. % No. % < 20 years 33 10.1 96 16.6 21-29 years 230 70.1 382 66.2 30-34 years 47 14.3 79 13.7 > 35 years 18 5.5 20 3.5 Total 328 100 577 100
P > 0.05 Not Significant
3.35% of total cases in Sujat treatment group developed PIH problems which is significantly low as compared to 10.39% in control group 81.8% of total cases (Table 2).
The Table 3 shows that in Sujat treatment PIH development amongst 72.7% were after the 36 weeks of gestation as compared to in control group out of total PIH cases 55% had problem before the 36 weeks of gestation.
TABLE 2 The percentage and severity of PIH. Sujat group showed significant reduction in the incidence and severity of PIH Severity Sujat Control No. % No. % Mild 9 81.8 32 53.3 Moderate 2 18.2 17 28.3 Severe — — 7 15.7 Eclampsia — — 4 6.7 Total
% of PIH
11 100 60 100% 3.35% 10.39%
P < 0.001 Highly significant
TABLE 3 Significant difference in the development of PIH in relation to gestational period. Sujat group PIH developed only after 36 weeks Gestation period inWk 3 Sujat Control No. % No. % 28-32 wk 1 9.09% 9 15.0% 32-36 wk 2 18.18% 24 40.0% > 36 wk 8 72.72% 27 45.0% Total 11 99.99% 60 100%
P < 0.05 significant
Percentage of PIH at Primi and Multi in the control Registered cases were 13.33% and 8.16% respectively as compared to 4.87% and 2.43% in Sujat treatment group which is significantly low.
TABLE 4 Percentage of PIH according to parity was not significant Groups Primi Multi Total Cases PIH Total Cases PIH Sujat 123 6 (4.87%) 205 5 (2.43%) Control 195 26 (13.33%) 392 32 (8.16%)
P < 0.01 Significant
Average birth weight of the babies in Sujat Group was 2.82 Kg which is significantly higher as compared to 2.58 kg in Control Group (Table 5).
The Table 6 shows that only 25.6% of total
TABLE 5 The comparison of average birth weight between Sujat and Control group. A significant increase of 115 gms wt. in Sujat group is the highlight of the study Group Average birth weight
(Mean ± SD)
Sujat 2.82 kg ± 0.44 kg Control 2.58 kg ± 0.55 kgP < 0.001 Highly significant
TABLE 6 Significant drops of number of babies weighing < 2.5 kg groups Weight in kg. Sujat Control
No % No. % < 2.5 Kg 84 25.60% 207 35.9% 2.5 to 3 Kg 167 50.9% 293 50.8% 3.01 and above 77 23.5% 77 13.3% Total 328 99.98% 577 99.98%P < 0.05 Significant
Fig 1 Percentage of PIH according to parity.
Fig 2 Comparison of average birth weight between sujat and control group
women in Sujat treatment had less than 2.5 kg. Foetal weight which is significantly less as compared to 35.9% in control registered cases.
Profile of field morbidity was more amongst the control registered cases i.e. 23.88% as compared to only 12.78% in Sujat treatment group which is significantly less (Table 7).
Number of babies required intensive care in Sujat group were significantly less as compared to 11.95% in control.
TABLE 7 Mode of delivery was not significantly different in both groups Morbidity Sujat
No. % No. % No. of babiesin NICU 22 6.70% 69 11.95% Still birth with FSB and MSB 3 0.91% 15 2.59% Congenital anomaly 2 0.60% 3 0.51% Pre-term deliveries 15 4.57% 51 8.83% Total 42 12.78% 138 23.88%P < 0.001 Highly Significant
The data below reveals that 82.6% and 81.10% of total cases had normal deliveries in Sujat and Treatment group respectively, which is almost same (Table 8).
TABLE 8 Foetal morbidity and perinatal mortality was significantly less in Sujat groups Mode of delivery Sujat
No. % No. % Normal 271 82.6 468 81.10 LSCS 41 12.5 81 14.00 Instrumental 16 4.9 28 4.9 Total 328 100 577 100P > 0.05 Not significant
Various treatment modes known so far for prophylaxis of PIH are as follows:
1. Calcium supplementation : Many studies conducted world over have given contradictory results.
Fig 3 Profile of morbidity (foetal) in both the groups.
Table 9 : Percentage of PIH Study Total No. of Pts. % PIH 1. Clasp Study 1994 9364 (4681) S-19.7%
2. Lancet : Low dose
aspirin in prevention of PIH
prevention of PIH and IUGR
3. Sujat Prevention of PIH 460 (190) (270) S-3.15%
2.Low dose aspirin: Aspirin is used to reduce the TXA2 by virtue of antiprostaglandin action. It is found to have lot of platelet related side effects like haemorrhages in the new born (we have compared our results with the published trials in Tables 9 and 10.
Sujat treatment goes on the basis of enhancing the endothelial cell activity without damaging platelets (as in the case of aspirin). It is a positive concept in contrast to low dose aspirin therapy.
Sujat is a blend of various factors viz. NO donors, antioxidants, essential amino acids (L arginine) essential fatty acids (GLA) Magnesium, Calcium and immuno modulators. Sujat formulation thus successfully helps in preventing PIH and pregnancy outcome.
Sujat is an efficient drug formulation to prevent PIH as well to enhance the foetal wt and foetal outcome. Prophylactic Sujat Therapy is an insurance to a comprehensive antenatal care and safe motherhood.
Table 10: Profile of average birth weight and perinatal death Study Total no.of Pts. Total no. Of Groups Average Birth Weight (SD) Perinatal Deaths 1. Lancet
(USG) and Aspirin
in recognition and
prevention of PIH
100 S 48
2954 gms (852)
3068 gms (555)
1 IUFD (42 Wks)
2 IUD (25 Wks) (28 Wks)
1 NND (27 Wks)
2. New England
Journal of Medicine
Use of aspirin to
prevention of PIH
65 S 34
No neomatal deaths (NND)
No neonatal deaths
3. Clasp : The
Low dose aspirin
for prevention of PIH
8259 S 4123
3024 gms (788)
2991 gms (810)
4. Lancet 1993 Feb.
Low dose aspirin
in prevention and treatment of IUGR and PIH
35.7 per 1000 birth
28.6 per 1000 birth
5. Sujat : A drug for
prevention of PIH
450 S 190
2739 gms (399.8)
2624 gms (470.6)
10.1 per 1000 births
21.92 per 1000 birthsKey - S : Study, C : Control
- CLASP. Lancet March 12, 1994; 343 (8898) : 619-29.
- Lancet I 1985; 840-42.
- Benigua. NEJM 1989; 321 : 357-62.
- Lancet 2 335-38, 975.
- Lancet Feb. 20, 1988; (8582) : 410.
- Br Med J 391 1277-78.
- Lancet 1990; 335 : 1552-55.
- JAMA 1988; 260 : 657-61.
- J Indian Med Assoc Jan. 1994; 92 (6) : 188-91.
- Bull Pan Am Health Organ 1991; 25 (2) : 109-A.
- JAMA Nov. 6, 1996; 276 (17) : 1387.
- Journal of Obst + Gynaecol June 1995; 21 (3) : 281-8.
- Br J Obstel Gynaecol Feb. 1995; 102 (2) : 123-6.
- Lancet Feb. 13, 1993; 341 (8842) : 396-400.
- J of Obst and Gynaecol 1995; 86 (4) : 600-608.
- J of Obst and Gynaecol Jan. 1988; 71 : 1.